Capitol Hill
conference is first step to get new policies that protect
small businesses.
Intellectual property (IP) rights are arguably the most
valuable assets in the business world today. Although America
has a well-established system in place for securing and
protecting intellectual property rights, many business owners
find intellectual property law to be highly confusing and
prohibitively expensive -- especially small business
entrepreneurs.
According to the 'Lectric Law Library, a respected online
legal research organization, "One of the worst shocks a small
business can receive is a lawsuit, or the threat of a suit,
alleging that the company should stop using its name." And
it’s easy to see why. Intellectual property disputes are very
expensive.
Patent litigation, in particular, is quite expensive,
costing between $1 million and $10 million according to a
survey conducted by the American Intellectual Property Law
Association. The average cost to litigate a trademark dispute
is less, but still difficult to swallow at approximately
$250,000.
This gives large companies advantages over small businesses
when it comes to intellectual property disputes. "When faced
with fighting a protracted legal battle with a much larger
company, most small businesses simply give up," notes Stephen
Sturgeon, a Washington, DC attorney whose firm, Stephen
Sturgeon & Associates, specializes in intellectual
property law involving domain names. He adds that even when
the odds of winning appear to be heavily in their favor, most
small businesses cannot afford to fight for their intellectual
property rights.
Scott Smith, president of EntrepreneurPR, a small public
relations firm in Sacramento, California, has been battling
his own IP lawsuit with Entrepreneur Magazine over the use of
the word "entrepreneur." He has spent almost 5 years and more
than $100,000 in his battle.
If you do find yourself in an in intellectual property
dispute, it’s important to seek help. Every defendant has a
limited time to respond to a lawsuit, so it’s best to contact
an attorney experienced in trademark litigation to explore
your options "Don’t try to be an island," recommends Jeff
Kravitz, an intellectual property attorney. "Small businesses
are often intimidated by the threats of larger companies in
the trademark arena. However, just because one company has
more money does not necessarily mean that they are going to
prevail," says Kravitz.
Neither major corporations or small businesses want to
allocate the funds needed for protracted IP legal battles, but
the bigger companies are much more likely to find the funds
needed to fight. "Intellectual property litigation is
expensive litigation," says Kravitz. For small business,
litigation can pull cash out of a budget where there is
precious little to spare.
To make matters worse, even giving up can be a financial
nightmare for a small business. Cintara, a full service
branding agency in Silicon Valley, California, estimates that
"$100,000 is the typical minimum cost of changing a name…even
if the name is free and is for a small business." Cintara fees
alone are $18,000 to $25,000 to develop names for
companies.
Many IP disputes can be avoided if small businesses take
the critical step of making a thorough trademark search to
ensure their name or idea will not infringe on an existing
trademark or patent. A mark that is confusingly similar to
other marks should raise a flag for potential problems. Every
business should take the necessary steps to protect
themselves, but always keep in mind there are no
guarantees.
Even when all the proverbial "t’s" are crossed and "i’s"
dotted, a small business can find themselves in hot water.
Smith hired a professional naming company who researched
trademarks. They helped him develop his company’s name, and
then he had a lawyer register the name with the U.S. Patent
and Trademark Office (USPTO).
According to Smith, The USPTO didn't feel there were any
conflicts between EntrepreneurPR’s and Entrepreneur Magazine’s
trademarks, but this didn’t protect him. In June 2000, a
federal judge ruled that Smith had to stop using the word
"entrepreneur." In February 2002, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court
of Appeals ruled unanimously in Smith’s favor, stating that
Entrepreneur Magazine's trademark is "weak" and that the
company does not have exclusive rights to the word
"entrepreneur." Despite this, the civil case against Smith
continues with a trial set for early 2003.
With an eye towards bringing these issues to the forefront
and providing a forum for discussion and solutions, Smith has
organized the "Acute IP Issues for Small Business
Conference" to be held in Washington, D.C. on November
15.
The objective of the conference is to bring attention to
the struggle smaller companies have with intellectual property
disputes, and to brainstorm ideas on the kind of legislative
relief small business owners need. The event is hosted by
EntrepreneurPR in cooperation with Rep. Donald Manzullo
(R-IL), Chairman of the House Committee on Small Business.
"This conference is the first of its kind and is an
important step in drawing attention to the issues. It will
generate further dialogue, and ultimately new policy
initiatives to protect small businesses, the backbone of the
U.S. economy," says Smith. "But it will be beneficial to all
if we succeed in simplifying and clarifying the processes.
It’s a win-win."
Editors Note::
Four things you
can do to minimize risk:
- Get a thorough trademark clearance search and legal
opinion.
- File for both state and federal registration.
- If you believe there is a likelihood of infringement,
purchase infringement insurance.
- If sued for infringement, or if you find another company
infringing your trademark, contact an attorney experienced
in trademark litigation.
Those interested in learning more about the "Acute IP
Issues for Small Business Conference," click here